STLD Q2 2025: Aluminum Expected to Reach EBITDA Break-Even in H2
- Aluminum EBITDA Upside: Management reiterated confidence in aluminum achieving EBITDA positive results in the second half of 2025 with ramping production and higher quality product mix, which supports an accelerated profitability trajectory and strengthens the overall growth narrative.
- Integrated Supply Chain & Recycled Content Advantage: The company’s robust, captive scrap recycling platform and the ability to enhance recycled content offer a significant cost‐competitive edge and operational synergy between its steel and aluminum segments, potentially improving margins and long‐term cash generation.
- Favorable Trade Policy Environment: Protective tariffs on imported steel and aluminum products and a supportive trade environment help create a competitive advantage for U.S.-produced products, delivering a level playing field that is expected to sustain domestic demand and pricing strength.
- Oxygen supply disruptions at Sinton: The oxygen vendor issues led to a reduction of approximately 55,000 tons in shipments at the Sinton mill, underscoring potential operational risks if similar supply challenges recur in the future.
- Execution and profitability uncertainties in the aluminum venture: The new aluminum operations are still in the start‐up phase with projected losses extending into later 2025. This raises concerns about the timeliness of reaching EBITDA breakeven and potential margin pressure in an evolving market environment.
- Exposure to trade and tariff risks: Ongoing discussions around tariffs—such as increased rates on pig iron imports—highlight potential volatility in raw material costs. Uncertainty in trade policy could translate into adverse impacts on input margins and overall cost structure.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | –1.5% | Total revenue dropped from $4,632.634 million in Q2 2024 to $4,565.1 million in Q2 2025 (-1.5% YoY), driven by major declines in Metals Recycling Operations (–55.5%) and Steel Fabrication Operations (–28%), which were only partly offset by a modest increase in Steel Operations and a significant turnaround in Aluminum Operations, reflecting a mixed segment performance compared to prior periods. |
Steel Operations | +0.9% | Steel Operations increased slightly from $3,247.962 million to $3,275.6 million (+0.9% YoY), likely owing to strong underlying demand and stable production bolstered by record shipments observed in previous periods, although the segment had faced metal spread compression challenges in earlier quarters. |
Metals Recycling Operations | –55.5% | Metals Recycling Operations declined sharply from $1,172.206 million to $522.7 million (-55.5% YoY), suggesting that lower scrap prices and diminished volumes have reversed the earlier momentum seen in improving metal spreads and operating income, highlighting significant external market pressures compared to previous performance. |
Steel Fabrication Operations | –28% | Steel Fabrication Operations fell from $473.736 million to $340.6 million (-28% YoY), reflecting ongoing challenges with average selling prices (down 17%) and decreasing shipment volumes (down 6%), which were consistent with the factors that had already pressured the segment in earlier periods. |
Aluminum Operations | +3417% | Aluminum Operations surged from $1.865 million to $65.6 million (+3417% YoY) as the recycled aluminum flat rolled products mill transitioned from a start-up phase to commercial operations, a change driven by significant capital investments and developmental progress, building on the prior period's focus on construction and start-up costs. |
Other | –18.3% | The “Other” category dropped from $441.138 million to $360.6 million (-18.3% YoY), primarily due to lower interest income from reduced invested cash balances and a marked decrease in profit-sharing expense, trends that were consistent with previous period observations. |
Intra-company Eliminations | Not reported in Q2 2025; vs –$704.273 million in Q2 2024 | Intra-company Eliminations were not reported in Q2 2025 compared to –$704.273 million in Q2 2024, possibly due to changes in intersegment transaction reporting or adjustments in internal transfers, although specific factors were not detailed in the documents. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Steel Fabrication Profitability | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | "Third-quarter earnings expected to improve sequentially; 15% increase in order backlog" | no prior guidance |
Operating Losses (Aluminum) | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | "$40 million" | no prior guidance |
Interest Expense | Q3 2025 | "$3 million" | "$30 million" | raised |
Biocarbon Facility Production Start | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | "Production expected to begin" | no prior guidance |
Ferrous Scrap Prices | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | "Remain relatively steady" | no prior guidance |
| Metric | Period | Guidance | Actual | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Steel Operations | Q2 2025 | Expectation of positive impacts from recent increases in flat-rolled steel pricing | 3,275.6 | Met |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Trade Policy | Emphasized Section 232 tariffs, favorable trade rulings, antidumping investigations, and trade cases to support domestic production ( ) | Highlighted benefits from announced Section 232 tariffs, challenges from potential pig iron tariffs, higher aluminum tariffs, and anticipation of USMCA renegotiation ( ) | Consistent focus with a more nuanced discussion—expanding details on specific tariffs and supply chain adjustments while maintaining the defensive stance on domestic production ( ) |
Aluminum EBITDA | Discussed through-cycle annual EBITDA targets of $650–700 million, ramp-up milestones, commissioning progress, and optimistic long-term outlook in Q3/Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 ( ) | Reported operating losses in H1 2025 with expectations for Q3 improvements and achieving monthly EBITDA-positive results by year end ( ) | Steady progress on ramping operations and commissioning with clear expectations for EBITDA positivity later in the year ( ) |
Steel Fabrication Demand | Reported strong order entry volumes, robust backlog extension into later quarters, and stable pricing dynamics in Q1, Q3, and Q4 2024 ( ) | Noted solid performance with a 15% increase in order backlog (extending into 2026) and expectations for improved third-quarter profitability despite rising input costs ( ) | Demand remains strong and consistent with incremental backlog growth even in a challenging pricing environment ( ) |
Operational Efficiency | Highlighted high utilization rates, record low injury rates, operational yield improvements at key assets such as Sinton, and strong safety cultures in Q3 and Q4 2024 as well as Q1 2025 ( ) | Reported all-time low recordable and lost-time injury rates, resolution of oxygen supply issues at Sinton, and continued progress in capacity expansion and yield improvements ( ) | Ongoing improvements in efficiency and execution with proactive mitigation of supply chain issues and continued asset ramp-up ( ) |
Capital Allocation | Emphasized a balanced cash strategy with high-return growth investments, consistent share repurchase programs, strong free cash flow generation, and disciplined capital spending in Q1, Q3, and Q4 2024 ( ) | Demonstrated strong liquidity with $1.9 billion available, active ongoing repurchase activity, robust cash flow generation, and clear debt repayment actions ( ) | Consistently strong liquidity and disciplined investment strategy, with an increased focus on shareholder returns and proactive capital management ( ) |
Integrated Supply Chain | Focused on leveraging a North American metals recycling platform to support both steel and aluminum operations, expanding scrap separation capabilities, and enhancing recycled content in Q1, Q3, and Q4 2024 ( ) | Emphasized using their integrated raw material platform and new separation technologies to drive higher recycled content and improve cost efficiencies ( ) | Continued emphasis on recycling integration and raw material sourcing with improved technology for enhancing recycled content and cost advantages ( ) |
Rising Input Costs | Discussed impacts of rising steel input costs on fabrication margins, noted price declines and margin compression in some segments, and outlined mitigation through volume gains in Q1 and Q3 2024 ( ) | Acknowledged rising input costs affecting both steel fabrication and aluminum operations but described mitigation efforts via pricing adjustments and volume increases ( ) | Persistent cost pressures remain, yet the company is actively offsetting these challenges through strategic pricing and volume expansion measures ( ) |
Liquidity and Refinancing | Maintained strong liquidity positions with robust cash balances, access to unsecured revolvers, and proactive refinancing plans including planned note rollovers as discussed in Q1 and Q4 2024 (and noted in Q3 indirectly) ( ) | Reported strong liquidity of $1.9 billion, completed key debt repayments, and maintained stable refinancing plans with increased interest expense in upcoming quarters being managed ( ) | Liquidity remains robust with proactive debt management and refinancing strategies ensuring stable capital structure ( ) |
Market Demand and Order Backlog | Reported historically strong order entry, robust order backlogs extending into later quarters, and a diversified demand across end markets in Q1, Q3, and Q4 2024 ( ) | Noted a 15% increase in order backlog extending into 2026 and stable domestic steel demand with optimism for pricing movements and future volume growth despite external uncertainties ( ) | Demand remains steady and robust, with incremental backlog growth and sustained confidence in end-market demand despite some pricing uncertainties ( ) |
-
Aluminum Outlook
Q: New aluminum venture market environment?
A: Management is upbeat about the aluminum market with a growing supply deficit, strong customer interest, and favorable tariff impacts. They remain confident in achieving $650M–$700M through-cycle EBITDA, noting an improved environment versus initial expectations. -
Sinton Performance
Q: Can Sinton hit a $500M EBITDA run rate?
A: Although Sinton faced an oxygen supply issue in Q2, management reported significant improvement over Q1 and expects product development and volume recovery to drive performance toward a $500M annualized EBITDA rate, likely materializing in 2026. -
Ali Utilization
Q: Why is aluminum business utilization lower?
A: The lower utilization is attributed to typical startup challenges; there’s no material change in outlook, and management expects the operation to be EBITDA positive in the second half as issues are resolved and ramp-up continues. -
Pig Iron Sourcing
Q: How are pig iron tariffs addressed?
A: Management explained that their flat rolled operations avoid reliance on purchased pig iron by using in-house production at the Butler facility and shifting sourcing to Brazil, thereby mitigating the impact of tariffs. -
Biocarbon Benefits
Q: What value does biocarbon offer?
A: Biocarbon enables replacement of part of the anthracite, reducing the carbon footprint by as much as 35% and offering process benefits like hydrogen production. This supports both sustainability goals and potential future pig iron production. -
Fab Inflection
Q: Is fabrication improvement driven by volume or price?
A: Management emphasized that the upcoming inflection in the fabrication segment is driven primarily by an increase in volume, with stable prices supporting margin recovery in the second half. -
Sales & SG&A Impact
Q: Will aluminum ramp add SG&A costs?
A: They operate separate sales teams for each business. With project startup costs moving into cost of goods sold, overall SG&A is expected to decline rather than increase. -
Substrate Cost Passing
Q: Are higher substrate costs passed through to customers?
A: While substrate prices are rising, management noted that the impact is moderated by increased volume, which helps compress overall costs, keeping profitability improvement on track. -
Aluminum Alloy Standards
Q: What defines aluminum alloy quality?
A: The qualification is based on standard grade series (3000, 5000, 6000), focusing on factors such as cleanliness, ductility, and process control—similar to steel qualification metrics. -
Mill Utilization & Mix
Q: Will mill utilization return to high levels?
A: Q2 challenges from oxygen issues and scheduled maintenance affected shipments, but management expects normalization in Q3 with mill utilization returning to historical levels and a balanced 50/50 mix between joists and deck.
Research analysts covering STEEL DYNAMICS.